DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2004 Brilliance M1 vs 2004 MG ZS Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Brilliance M1

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

54.25–53.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Brilliance M1SpecificationMG ZS
BrillianceMakeMG
M1ModelZS
2004Model year2004
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

Brilliance M1SpecificationMG ZS
13,8 s0–100 km/h9,0 s
190 km/hTop speed19 km/h
1997 ccEngine displacement1795 cc
129 HPPower117 HP
173 NmTorque160 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Brilliance M1SpecificationMG ZS
PetrolFuel typePetrol
74 ltFuel tank55 lt
—Urban consumption9,7 lt
—Extra-urban consumption5,8 lt
—Average consumption7,3 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Brilliance M1SpecificationMG ZS
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/65 R15Tyre size205/45 R17
—ABSYes

Dimensions

Brilliance M1SpecificationMG ZS
4880 mmLength4520 mm
1800 mmWidth1700 mm
1450 mmHeight1390 mm
1420 KgWeight1125 Kg
—Wheelbase2620 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2004 Brilliance M1 and 2004 MG ZS approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Brilliance M1 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…