DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2005 Daewoo Rezzo vs 2004 Brilliance M1 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Brilliance M1

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

53.5–54.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

DaewooMakeBrilliance
RezzoModelM1
2005Model year2004
MinivanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

12,4 s0–100 km/h13,8 s
104 km/hTop speed190 km/h
1998 ccEngine displacement1997 cc
128 HPPower129 HP
176 NmTorque173 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank74 lt
15,1 ltUrban consumption—
8,2 ltExtra-urban consumption—
10,8 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
4Gears5
195/60 R15Tyre size195/65 R15
YesABS—

Dimensions

4350 mmLength4880 mm
1750 mmWidth1800 mm
1580 mmHeight1450 mm
1392 KgWeight1420 Kg
2600 mmWheelbase—

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2005 Daewoo Rezzo and 2004 Brilliance M1 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Brilliance M1 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…