DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2004 Brilliance M1 vs 2005 Daewoo Rezzo Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Brilliance M1

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

54.25–53.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

BrillianceMakeDaewoo
M1ModelRezzo
2004Model year2005
SedanBody typeMinivan
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

13,8 s0–100 km/h12,4 s
190 km/hTop speed104 km/h
1997 ccEngine displacement1998 cc
129 HPPower128 HP
173 NmTorque176 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
74 ltFuel tank60 lt
—Urban consumption15,1 lt
—Extra-urban consumption8,2 lt
—Average consumption10,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears4
195/65 R15Tyre size195/60 R15
—ABSYes

Dimensions

4880 mmLength4350 mm
1800 mmWidth1750 mm
1450 mmHeight1580 mm
1420 KgWeight1392 Kg
—Wheelbase2600 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2004 Brilliance M1 and 2005 Daewoo Rezzo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Brilliance M1 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…