DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2016 Volkswagen Ameo vs 2016 Nissan AD Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Volkswagen Ameo

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

65.25–64.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

VolkswagenMakeNissan
AmeoModelAD
2016Model year2016
SedanBody typeEstate
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

9,9 s0–100 km/h—
185 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1498 ccEngine displacement1597 cc
110 HPPower109 HP
250 NmTorque150 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
45 ltFuel tank41 lt
10,9 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
5Gears4
175/70 R14; 185/60 R15Tyre size—
YesABS—

Dimensions

3995 mmLength4395 mm
1682 mmWidth1695 mm
1483 mmHeight1500 mm
1138-1163 KgWeight1250 Kg
2470 mmWheelbase2600 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2016 Volkswagen Ameo and 2016 Nissan AD approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Volkswagen Ameo leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…