DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2016 Nissan AD vs 2016 Volkswagen Ameo Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Volkswagen Ameo

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

64.5–65.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

NissanMakeVolkswagen
ADModelAmeo
2016Model year2016
EstateBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

—0–100 km/h9,9 s
0 km/hTop speed185 km/h
1597 ccEngine displacement1498 cc
109 HPPower110 HP
150 NmTorque250 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
41 ltFuel tank45 lt
—Average consumption10,9 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
4Gears5
—Tyre size175/70 R14; 185/60 R15
—ABSYes

Dimensions

4395 mmLength3995 mm
1695 mmWidth1682 mm
1500 mmHeight1483 mm
1250 KgWeight1138-1163 Kg
2600 mmWheelbase2470 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2016 Nissan AD and 2016 Volkswagen Ameo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Volkswagen Ameo leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…