DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2017 Volkswagen Amarok vs 2017 Ford Ranger Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford Ranger

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 3 points.

73.5–76.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

VolkswagenMakeFord
AmarokModelRanger
2017Model year2017
Pick-upBody typePick-up
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

9,6-9.9 s0–100 km/h—
173 km/hTop speed175 km/h
2967 ccEngine displacement2198 cc
163 HPPower160 HP
450 NmTorque385 Nm
6Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typeDiesel
80 ltFuel tank80 lt
10,0 ltUrban consumption—
7,0 ltExtra-urban consumption—
8,1 ltAverage consumption6,9 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
6Gears6
245/65 R17Tyre size215/70 R16; 255/70 R16; 265/65 R17; 265/60 R18
YesABSYes

Dimensions

5254 mmLength5362 mm
1954 mmWidth1860 mm
1834 mmHeight1815 mm
1949 KgWeight1883 Kg
3097 mmWheelbase3220 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2017 Volkswagen Amarok and 2017 Ford Ranger approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford Ranger leads the E-Kıyasla score by 3 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…