DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2012 Volvo C30 vs 2012 Volkswagen Amarok Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Volkswagen Amarok

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

67.75–68.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

VolvoMakeVolkswagen
C30ModelAmarok
2012Model year2012
CoupeBody typePick-up
5Seats5
3Doors4

Performance

8,6 s0–100 km/h10,3-10.7 s
0 km/hTop speed179 km/h
1984 ccEngine displacement1968 cc
177 HPPower180 HP
400 NmTorque400 Nm
5Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typeDiesel
60 ltFuel tank80 lt
7,0 ltUrban consumption8,6 lt
4,0 ltExtra-urban consumption6,7 lt
5,1 ltAverage consumption7,4 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
6Gears6
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4266 mmLength5254 mm
1782 mmWidth1944 mm
1447 mmHeight1834 mm
1451 KgWeight1905 Kg
2640 mmWheelbase3095 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2012 Volvo C30 and 2012 Volkswagen Amarok approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Volkswagen Amarok leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…