DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2016 Borgward BX6 vs 2016 Jaguar XF Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Borgward BX6

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

81.75–80.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

BorgwardMakeJaguar
BX6ModelXF
2016Model year2016
SUVBody typeSedan
4Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

—0–100 km/h8,0 s
220 km/hTop speed230 km/h
1981 ccEngine displacement1999 cc
224 HPPower180 HP
300 NmTorque430 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
0 ltFuel tank66 lt
—Urban consumption5,1 lt
—Extra-urban consumption3,9 lt
—Average consumption4,3 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainRear-wheel drive
7Gears6
245/45 R20Tyre size—
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4490 mmLength4954 mm
1870 mmWidth1987 mm
1649 mmHeight1457 mm
—Weight1585 Kg
2685 mmWheelbase2960 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2016 Borgward BX6 and 2016 Jaguar XF approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Borgward BX6 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…