DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2016 Audi Q3 vs 2016 Borgward BX6 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Borgward BX6

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

80.75–81.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Audi Q3SpecificationBorgward BX6
AudiMakeBorgward
Q3ModelBX6
2016Model year2016
SUVBody typeSUV
5Seats4
5Doors4

Performance

Audi Q3SpecificationBorgward BX6
6,4 s0–100 km/h—
233 km/hTop speed220 km/h
1984 ccEngine displacement1981 cc
220 HPPower224 HP
350 NmTorque300 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Audi Q3SpecificationBorgward BX6
PetrolFuel typePetrol
64 ltFuel tank0 lt
8,0 ltUrban consumption—
5,9 ltExtra-urban consumption—
6,6 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Audi Q3SpecificationBorgward BX6
4x4Drivetrain4x4
7 S tronicGears7
235/55 R17Tyre size245/45 R20
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Audi Q3SpecificationBorgward BX6
4388 mmLength4490 mm
1831 mmWidth1870 mm
1608 mmHeight1649 mm
1565 KgWeight—
2603 mmWheelbase2685 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2016 Audi Q3 and 2016 Borgward BX6 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Borgward BX6 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…