DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 BMW Z4 vs 2003 Nissan X-Terra Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Nissan X-Terra

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

75.75–76.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

BMWMakeNissan
Z4ModelX-Terra
2003Model year2003
CabrioletBody typeOff-road vehicle
2Seats5
2Doors5

Performance

5,9 s0–100 km/h—
244 km/hTop speed210 km/h
2979 ccEngine displacement3275 cc
231 HPPower210 HP
300 NmTorque313 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
55 ltFuel tank73 lt
13,5 ltUrban consumption15,7 lt
6,6 ltExtra-urban consumption13,1 lt
7,5 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
6Gears5
225/45 R17Tyre size235/70 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4091 mmLength4520 mm
1781 mmWidth1790 mm
1299 mmHeight1860 mm
1365 KgWeight1900 Kg
2495 mmWheelbase2650 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 BMW Z4 and 2003 Nissan X-Terra approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Nissan X-Terra leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…