DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 Nissan X-Terra vs 2003 BMW Z4 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Nissan X-Terra

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

76.75–75.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

NissanMakeBMW
X-TerraModelZ4
2003Model year2003
Off-road vehicleBody typeCabriolet
5Seats2
5Doors2

Performance

—0–100 km/h5,9 s
210 km/hTop speed244 km/h
3275 ccEngine displacement2979 cc
210 HPPower231 HP
313 NmTorque300 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
73 ltFuel tank55 lt
15,7 ltUrban consumption13,5 lt
13,1 ltExtra-urban consumption6,6 lt
—Average consumption7,5 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears6
235/70 R15Tyre size225/45 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4520 mmLength4091 mm
1790 mmWidth1781 mm
1860 mmHeight1299 mm
1900 KgWeight1365 Kg
2650 mmWheelbase2495 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 Nissan X-Terra and 2003 BMW Z4 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Nissan X-Terra leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…