E-Kıyasla
DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 BMW Z4 vs 2012 Audi TT Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Audi TT

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 8.25 points.

70.5–78.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

BMW Z4SpecificationAudi TT
BMWMakeAudi
Z4ModelTT
2003Model year2012
CabrioletBody typeCoupe
2Seats2+2
2Doors2

Performance

BMW Z4SpecificationAudi TT
7,0 s0–100 km/h6,1 s
235 km/hTop speed245 km/h
2494 ccEngine displacement1984 cc
192 HPPower211 HP
245 NmTorque350 Nm
6Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

BMW Z4SpecificationAudi TT
PetrolFuel typePetrol
55 ltFuel tank55 lt
10,4 ltUrban consumption8,9 lt
5,7 ltExtra-urban consumption5,2 lt
7,4 ltAverage consumption6,6 lt

Transmission & Chassis

BMW Z4SpecificationAudi TT
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
225/50 R16Tyre size225/55 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

BMW Z4SpecificationAudi TT
4091 mmLength4198 mm
1781 mmWidth1842 mm
1299 mmHeight1353 mm
1335 KgWeight1280 Kg
2495 mmWheelbase2468 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 BMW Z4 and 2012 Audi TT approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Audi TT leads the E-Kıyasla score by 8.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

2003 Volvo S60VS2003 BMW Z4Volvo S60 vs BMW Z42003 and 2003 model years2003 Volvo S80VS2003 BMW Z4Volvo S80 vs BMW Z42003 and 2003 model years2003 Volvo V70VS2003 BMW Z4Volvo V70 vs BMW Z42003 and 2003 model years2003 Kia OptimaVS2003 BMW Z4Kia Optima vs BMW Z42003 and 2003 model yearsImage unavailableVS2003 BMW Z4Hyundai Grandeur/Azera vs BMW Z42003 and 2003 model years

Comments are loading…