DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Toyota Vitz vs 1999 Chevrolet Metro Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Toyota Vitz

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

52.5–51.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

ToyotaMakeChevrolet
VitzModelMetro
2000Model year1999
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
3/5Doors3

Performance

0 km/hTop speed145 km/h
997 ccEngine displacement993 cc
70 HPPower56 HP
95 NmTorque78 Nm
4Cylinders3

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
40 ltFuel tank39 lt
4,6 ltUrban consumption5,7 lt
3,3 ltExtra-urban consumption5,3 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
155/80 R13 STyre size155/80 R13
YesABSYes

Dimensions

3610 mmLength3790 mm
1660 mmWidth1590 mm
1500 mmHeight1390 mm
810 KgWeight860 Kg
2370 mmWheelbase2360 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Toyota Vitz and 1999 Chevrolet Metro approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Toyota Vitz leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…