DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1999 Chevrolet Metro vs 2000 Toyota Vitz Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Toyota Vitz

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

51.5–52.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

ChevroletMakeToyota
MetroModelVitz
1999Model year2000
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
3Doors3/5

Performance

145 km/hTop speed0 km/h
993 ccEngine displacement997 cc
56 HPPower70 HP
78 NmTorque95 Nm
3Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
39 ltFuel tank40 lt
5,7 ltUrban consumption4,6 lt
5,3 ltExtra-urban consumption3,3 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
155/80 R13Tyre size155/80 R13 S
YesABSYes

Dimensions

3790 mmLength3610 mm
1590 mmWidth1660 mm
1390 mmHeight1500 mm
860 KgWeight810 Kg
2360 mmWheelbase2370 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1999 Chevrolet Metro and 2000 Toyota Vitz approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Toyota Vitz leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…