E-Kıyasla
DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2004 BMW X5 vs 2004 BMW Z3 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

BMW Z3

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

78.75–79.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

BMW X5SpecificationBMW Z3
BMWMakeBMW
X5ModelZ3
2004Model year2004
SUVBody typeCoupe
5Seats2
5Doors3

Performance

BMW X5SpecificationBMW Z3
8,3 s0–100 km/h6,0 s
210 km/hTop speed250 km/h
2993 ccEngine displacement2979 cc
218 HPPower231 HP
500 NmTorque300 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

BMW X5SpecificationBMW Z3
DieselFuel typePetrol
93 ltFuel tank51 lt
11,4 ltUrban consumption13,3 lt
7,0 ltExtra-urban consumption7,3 lt
8,6 ltAverage consumption9,5 lt

Transmission & Chassis

BMW X5SpecificationBMW Z3
4x4DrivetrainRear-wheel drive
6Gears5
235/65 R17Tyre size225/50 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

BMW X5SpecificationBMW Z3
4667 mmLength4025 mm
1872 mmWidth1740 mm
1715 mmHeight1306 mm
2170 KgWeight1305 Kg
2820 mmWheelbase2446 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2004 BMW X5 and 2004 BMW Z3 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, BMW Z3 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

2004 BMW Z3VS2004 BMW X5BMW Z3 vs BMW X52004 and 2004 model years2004 Alfa Romeo 156VS2004 BMW X5Alfa Romeo 156 vs BMW X52004 and 2004 model years2005 Citroen C5VS2004 BMW X5Citroen C5 vs BMW X52005 and 2004 model yearsImage unavailableVS2004 BMW X5SsangYong Chairman vs BMW X52005 and 2004 model years2004 Volvo S80VS2004 BMW X5Volvo S80 vs BMW X52004 and 2004 model years

Comments are loading…