DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2004 BMW Z3 vs 2005 Saab 9-3 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

BMW Z3

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

79.5–78.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

BMW Z3SpecificationSaab 9-3
BMWMakeSaab
Z3Model9-3
2004Model year2005
CoupeBody typeCabriolet
2Seats4
3Doors2

Performance

BMW Z3SpecificationSaab 9-3
6,0 s0–100 km/h8,0 s
250 km/hTop speed245 km/h
2979 ccEngine displacement2792 cc
231 HPPower250 HP
300 NmTorque350 Nm
6Cylinders—

Fuel & Consumption

BMW Z3SpecificationSaab 9-3
PetrolFuel typePetrol
51 ltFuel tank62 lt
13,3 ltUrban consumption—
7,3 ltExtra-urban consumption—
9,5 ltAverage consumption10,6 lt

Transmission & Chassis

BMW Z3SpecificationSaab 9-3
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears6
225/50 R16Tyre size225/45 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

BMW Z3SpecificationSaab 9-3
4025 mmLength4635 mm
1740 mmWidth1762 mm
1306 mmHeight1434 mm
1305 KgWeight—
2446 mmWheelbase2675 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2004 BMW Z3 and 2005 Saab 9-3 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, BMW Z3 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…