DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2004 BMW Z3 vs 2005 Renault Clio Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

BMW Z3

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

79.5–78.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

BMW Z3SpecificationRenault Clio
BMWMakeRenault
Z3ModelClio
2004Model year2005
CoupeBody typeCoupe
2Seats2
3Doors2

Performance

BMW Z3SpecificationRenault Clio
6,0 s0–100 km/h6,0 s
250 km/hTop speed235 km/h
2979 ccEngine displacement2946 cc
231 HPPower255 HP
300 NmTorque300 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

BMW Z3SpecificationRenault Clio
PetrolFuel typePetrol
51 ltFuel tank61 lt
13,3 ltUrban consumption14,9 lt
7,3 ltExtra-urban consumption8,9 lt
9,5 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

BMW Z3SpecificationRenault Clio
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears5
225/50 R16Tyre size205/50 R17; 235/45 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

BMW Z3SpecificationRenault Clio
4025 mmLength3800 mm
1740 mmWidth1810 mm
1306 mmHeight1360 mm
1305 KgWeight1335 Kg
2446 mmWheelbase2510 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2004 BMW Z3 and 2005 Renault Clio approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, BMW Z3 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…