DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2004 BMW Z3 vs 2004 Jaguar S-type Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

BMW Z3

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

79.5–78.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

BMW Z3SpecificationJaguar S-type
BMWMakeJaguar
Z3ModelS-type
2004Model year2004
CoupeBody typeSedan
2Seats5
3Doors4

Performance

BMW Z3SpecificationJaguar S-type
6,0 s0–100 km/h8,5 s
250 km/hTop speed230 km/h
2979 ccEngine displacement2720 cc
231 HPPower207 HP
300 NmTorque435 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

BMW Z3SpecificationJaguar S-type
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
51 ltFuel tank68 lt
13,3 ltUrban consumption9,7 lt
7,3 ltExtra-urban consumption5,7 lt
9,5 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

BMW Z3SpecificationJaguar S-type
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears6
225/50 R16Tyre size235/50 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

BMW Z3SpecificationJaguar S-type
4025 mmLength4861 mm
1740 mmWidth1819 mm
1306 mmHeight1441 mm
1305 KgWeight1722 Kg
2446 mmWheelbase2909 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2004 BMW Z3 and 2004 Jaguar S-type approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, BMW Z3 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…