DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 BMW Z3 vs 2003 BMW X3 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

BMW Z3

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

79.5–78.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

BMW Z3SpecificationBMW X3
BMWMakeBMW
Z3ModelX3
2003Model year2003
CabrioletBody typeSUV
2Seats5
2Doors5

Performance

BMW Z3SpecificationBMW X3
6,0 s0–100 km/h7,9 s
250 km/hTop speed210 km/h
2979 ccEngine displacement2993 cc
231 HPPower204 HP
300 NmTorque410 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

BMW Z3SpecificationBMW X3
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
51 ltFuel tank67 lt
13 ltUrban consumption11,1 lt
7,5 ltExtra-urban consumption6,9 lt
—Average consumption8,4 lt

Transmission & Chassis

BMW Z3SpecificationBMW X3
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
5Gears6
225/50 R16Tyre size235/55 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

BMW Z3SpecificationBMW X3
4050 mmLength4569 mm
1740 mmWidth1853 mm
1306 mmHeight1674 mm
1305 KgWeight1835 Kg
2446 mmWheelbase2795 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 BMW Z3 and 2003 BMW X3 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, BMW Z3 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…