DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2004 Audi A6 vs 2003 BMW Z3 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

BMW Z3

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

78.75–79.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Audi A6SpecificationBMW Z3
AudiMakeBMW
A6ModelZ3
2004Model year2003
SedanBody typeCabriolet
5Seats2
4Doors2

Performance

Audi A6SpecificationBMW Z3
7,1 s0–100 km/h6,0 s
245 km/hTop speed250 km/h
2967 ccEngine displacement2979 cc
225 HPPower231 HP
450 NmTorque300 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

Audi A6SpecificationBMW Z3
DieselFuel typePetrol
80 ltFuel tank51 lt
11,2 ltUrban consumption13 lt
6,0 ltExtra-urban consumption7,5 lt
7,9 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Audi A6SpecificationBMW Z3
4x4DrivetrainRear-wheel drive
6Gears5
225/55 R16Tyre size225/50 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Audi A6SpecificationBMW Z3
4916 mmLength4050 mm
1855 mmWidth1740 mm
1459 mmHeight1306 mm
1745 KgWeight1305 Kg
2843 mmWheelbase2446 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2004 Audi A6 and 2003 BMW Z3 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, BMW Z3 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…