DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 Toyota Tundra vs 2003 Lexus RX Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Lexus RX

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

65.5–66.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

ToyotaMakeLexus
TundraModelRX
2003Model year2003
Pick-upBody typeOff-road vehicle
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

—0–100 km/h9,2 s
0 km/hTop speed180 km/h
3378 ccEngine displacement2995 cc
190 HPPower201 HP
298 NmTorque283 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
100 ltFuel tank75 lt
14,7 ltUrban consumption17,7 lt
11,7 ltExtra-urban consumption10,3 lt
—Average consumption13 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears4
245/70 R16; 265/70 R16; 265/65 R17Tyre size225/60 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

5545 mmLength4580 mm
1910 mmWidth1815 mm
1796 mmHeight1660 mm
1886 KgWeight1800 Kg
3259 mmWheelbase2615 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 Toyota Tundra and 2003 Lexus RX approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Lexus RX leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…