DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 Lexus RX vs 2003 Toyota Tundra Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Lexus RX

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

66.25–65.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

LexusMakeToyota
RXModelTundra
2003Model year2003
Off-road vehicleBody typePick-up
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

9,2 s0–100 km/h—
180 km/hTop speed0 km/h
2995 ccEngine displacement3378 cc
201 HPPower190 HP
283 NmTorque298 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
75 ltFuel tank100 lt
17,7 ltUrban consumption14,7 lt
10,3 ltExtra-urban consumption11,7 lt
13 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
4Gears5
225/60 R17Tyre size245/70 R16; 265/70 R16; 265/65 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4580 mmLength5545 mm
1815 mmWidth1910 mm
1660 mmHeight1796 mm
1800 KgWeight1886 Kg
2615 mmWheelbase3259 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 Lexus RX and 2003 Toyota Tundra approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Lexus RX leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…