2003 • Toyota
Tundra
Toyota Tundra 3.4i (190 Hp) 2003Overall Score65.5/100
2003 Toyota Tundra vs 2003 Holden Caprice Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2003 • Holden
Caprice
Holden Caprice 3.8 i V6 (200 Hp) 2003Overall Score64.75/100
WINNER
Toyota Tundra
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
65.5–64.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Toyota TundraSpecificationHolden Caprice
ToyotaMakeHolden
TundraModelCaprice
2003Model year2003
Pick-upBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4
Performance
Toyota TundraSpecificationHolden Caprice
—0–100 km/h9,7 s
0 km/hTop speed0 km/h
3378 ccEngine displacement3791 cc
190 HPPower200 HP
298 NmTorque304 Nm
6Cylinders6
Fuel & Consumption
Toyota TundraSpecificationHolden Caprice
PetrolFuel typePetrol
100 ltFuel tank75 lt
14,7 ltUrban consumption12 lt
11,7 ltExtra-urban consumption7,4 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Toyota TundraSpecificationHolden Caprice
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears4
245/70 R16; 265/70 R16; 265/65 R17Tyre size225/55 R16 V
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Toyota TundraSpecificationHolden Caprice
5545 mmLength5237 mm
1910 mmWidth1847 mm
1796 mmHeight1459 mm
1886 KgWeight1690 Kg
3259 mmWheelbase2939 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2003 Toyota Tundra and 2003 Holden Caprice approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Toyota Tundra leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…