DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 BMW Z3 vs 2000 Seat Alhambra Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Seat Alhambra

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

59.25–59.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

BMW Z3SpecificationSeat Alhambra
BMWMakeSeat
Z3ModelAlhambra
2000Model year2000
CabrioletBody typeMinivan
2Seats7
2Doors4

Performance

BMW Z3SpecificationSeat Alhambra
10,4 s0–100 km/h13,7 s
196 km/hTop speed181 km/h
1895 ccEngine displacement1896 cc
118 HPPower115 HP
190 NmTorque310 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

BMW Z3SpecificationSeat Alhambra
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
51 ltFuel tank70 lt
11 ltUrban consumption8,4 lt
6 ltExtra-urban consumption5,3 lt
—Average consumption6,1 lt

Transmission & Chassis

BMW Z3SpecificationSeat Alhambra
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears6
225/50 R16Tyre size195/65 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

BMW Z3SpecificationSeat Alhambra
4050 mmLength4634 mm
1740 mmWidth1810 mm
1288 mmHeight1707 mm
1220 KgWeight1666 Kg
2446 mmWheelbase2841 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 BMW Z3 and 2000 Seat Alhambra approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Seat Alhambra leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…