DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Seat Alhambra vs 2000 BMW Z3 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Seat Alhambra

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

59.5–59.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Seat AlhambraSpecificationBMW Z3
SeatMakeBMW
AlhambraModelZ3
2000Model year2000
MinivanBody typeCabriolet
7Seats2
4Doors2

Performance

Seat AlhambraSpecificationBMW Z3
13,7 s0–100 km/h10,4 s
181 km/hTop speed196 km/h
1896 ccEngine displacement1895 cc
116 HPPower118 HP
310 NmTorque190 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Seat AlhambraSpecificationBMW Z3
DieselFuel typePetrol
70 ltFuel tank51 lt
8,4 ltUrban consumption11 lt
5,3 ltExtra-urban consumption6 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Seat AlhambraSpecificationBMW Z3
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
6Gears5
205/60 R15Tyre size225/50 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Seat AlhambraSpecificationBMW Z3
4634 mmLength4050 mm
1810 mmWidth1740 mm
1762 mmHeight1288 mm
1680 KgWeight1220 Kg
2841 mmWheelbase2446 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Seat Alhambra and 2000 BMW Z3 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Seat Alhambra leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…