DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 BMW Z3 vs 2000 Renault Laguna Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Renault Laguna

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

59.25–59.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

BMWMakeRenault
Z3ModelLaguna
2000Model year2000
CabrioletBody typeHatchback
2Seats5
2Doors5

Performance

10,4 s0–100 km/h9,8 s
196 km/hTop speed205 km/h
1895 ccEngine displacement1998 cc
118 HPPower140 HP
190 NmTorque188 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
51 ltFuel tank66 lt
11 ltUrban consumption—
6 ltExtra-urban consumption—
—Average consumption8,5 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
225/50 R16Tyre size195/60 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4050 mmLength4508 mm
1740 mmWidth1752 mm
1288 mmHeight1442 mm
1220 KgWeight1280 Kg
2446 mmWheelbase2670 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 BMW Z3 and 2000 Renault Laguna approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Renault Laguna leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…