DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 BMW Z3 vs 2000 Nissan Avenir Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Nissan Avenir

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

59.25–59.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

BMW Z3SpecificationNissan Avenir
BMWMakeNissan
Z3ModelAvenir
2000Model year2000
CabrioletBody typeEstate
2Seats5
2Doors5

Performance

BMW Z3SpecificationNissan Avenir
10,4 s0–100 km/h—
196 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1895 ccEngine displacement1998 cc
118 HPPower140 HP
190 NmTorque186 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

BMW Z3SpecificationNissan Avenir
PetrolFuel typePetrol
51 ltFuel tank60 lt
11 ltUrban consumption—
6 ltExtra-urban consumption—
—Average consumption10,4 lt

Transmission & Chassis

BMW Z3SpecificationNissan Avenir
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
5Gears4
225/50 R16Tyre size185/65 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

BMW Z3SpecificationNissan Avenir
4050 mmLength4650 mm
1740 mmWidth1695 mm
1288 mmHeight1490 mm
1220 KgWeight1460 Kg
2446 mmWheelbase2620 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 BMW Z3 and 2000 Nissan Avenir approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Nissan Avenir leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…