DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 BMW Z3 vs 2000 Mazda Capella Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda Capella

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

59.25–59.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

BMW Z3SpecificationMazda Capella
BMWMakeMazda
Z3ModelCapella
2000Model year2000
CabrioletBody typeSedan
2Seats5
2Doors4

Performance

BMW Z3SpecificationMazda Capella
10,4 s0–100 km/h—
196 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1895 ccEngine displacement1995 cc
118 HPPower140 HP
190 NmTorque186 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

BMW Z3SpecificationMazda Capella
PetrolFuel typePetrol
51 ltFuel tank60 lt
11 ltUrban consumption—
6 ltExtra-urban consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

BMW Z3SpecificationMazda Capella
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears—
225/50 R16Tyre size175/70 R14
YesABS—

Dimensions

BMW Z3SpecificationMazda Capella
4050 mmLength4575 mm
1740 mmWidth1695 mm
1288 mmHeight1440 mm
1220 KgWeight1210 Kg
2446 mmWheelbase2610 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 BMW Z3 and 2000 Mazda Capella approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda Capella leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…