DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 BMW Z3 vs 2000 Mazda 323 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda 323

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

59.25–59.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

BMW Z3SpecificationMazda 323
BMWMakeMazda
Z3Model323
2000Model year2000
CabrioletBody typeHatchback
2Seats5
2Doors5

Performance

BMW Z3SpecificationMazda 323
10,4 s0–100 km/h9,7 s
196 km/hTop speed203 km/h
1895 ccEngine displacement1991 cc
118 HPPower130 HP
190 NmTorque171 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

BMW Z3SpecificationMazda 323
PetrolFuel typePetrol
51 ltFuel tank55 lt
11 ltUrban consumption11,2 lt
6 ltExtra-urban consumption6,9 lt
—Average consumption8,5 lt

Transmission & Chassis

BMW Z3SpecificationMazda 323
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
225/50 R16Tyre size195/50 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

BMW Z3SpecificationMazda 323
4050 mmLength4290 mm
1740 mmWidth1705 mm
1288 mmHeight1420 mm
1220 KgWeight1185 Kg
2446 mmWheelbase2610 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 BMW Z3 and 2000 Mazda 323 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda 323 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…