DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 BMW Z3 vs 2000 Ford Cougar Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford Cougar

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

59.25–59.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

BMW Z3SpecificationFord Cougar
BMWMakeFord
Z3ModelCougar
2000Model year2000
CabrioletBody typeCoupe
2Seats4
2Doors3

Performance

BMW Z3SpecificationFord Cougar
10,4 s0–100 km/h9,6 s
196 km/hTop speed209 km/h
1895 ccEngine displacement1988 cc
118 HPPower131 HP
190 NmTorque178 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

BMW Z3SpecificationFord Cougar
PetrolFuel typePetrol
51 ltFuel tank60 lt
11 ltUrban consumption11,6 lt
6 ltExtra-urban consumption6,1 lt

Transmission & Chassis

BMW Z3SpecificationFord Cougar
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
225/50 R16Tyre size205/60 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

BMW Z3SpecificationFord Cougar
4050 mmLength4700 mm
1740 mmWidth1777 mm
1288 mmHeight1320 mm
1220 KgWeight1315 Kg
2446 mmWheelbase2705 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 BMW Z3 and 2000 Ford Cougar approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford Cougar leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…