DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 BMW Z3 vs 2000 Chrysler Neon Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Chrysler Neon

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

59.25–59.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

BMW Z3SpecificationChrysler Neon
BMWMakeChrysler
Z3ModelNeon
2000Model year2000
CabrioletBody typeSedan
2Seats5
2Doors4

Performance

BMW Z3SpecificationChrysler Neon
10,4 s0–100 km/h9,0 s
196 km/hTop speed200 km/h
1895 ccEngine displacement1996 cc
118 HPPower133 HP
190 NmTorque175 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

BMW Z3SpecificationChrysler Neon
PetrolFuel typePetrol
51 ltFuel tank47 lt
11 ltUrban consumption11,1 lt
6 ltExtra-urban consumption6,3 lt
—Average consumption8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

BMW Z3SpecificationChrysler Neon
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
225/50 R16Tyre size185/60 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

BMW Z3SpecificationChrysler Neon
4050 mmLength4390 mm
1740 mmWidth1715 mm
1288 mmHeight1421 mm
1220 KgWeight1245 Kg
2446 mmWheelbase2667 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 BMW Z3 and 2000 Chrysler Neon approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Chrysler Neon leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…