DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Toyota Supra vs 2000 Nissan Cedric Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Toyota Supra

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

82.5–81.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

ToyotaMakeNissan
SupraModelCedric
2000Model year2000
CoupeBody typeSedan
4Seats5
3Doors4

Performance

5,1 s0–100 km/h—
256 km/hTop speed220 km/h
2997 ccEngine displacement2987 cc
280 HPPower280 HP
432 NmTorque387 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
70 ltFuel tank80 lt
13 ltUrban consumption18 lt
9 ltExtra-urban consumption11 lt
11 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
6Gears4
225/50 ZR16; 245/50 ZR16Tyre size205/60 R16 H
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4520 mmLength4860 mm
1810 mmWidth1770 mm
1275 mmHeight1450 mm
1510 KgWeight1660 Kg
2550 mmWheelbase2800 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Toyota Supra and 2000 Nissan Cedric approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Toyota Supra leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…