2001 • Nissan
Cima
Nissan Cima 3.0 i V6 24V Turbo (280 Hp) 2001Overall Score81.75/100
2001 Nissan Cima vs 2000 Toyota Supra Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2000 • Toyota
Supra
Toyota Supra 3.0i 24V Turbo (280 Hp) 2000Overall Score82.5/100
WINNER
Toyota Supra
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
81.75–82.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Nissan CimaSpecificationToyota Supra
NissanMakeToyota
CimaModelSupra
2001Model year2000
SedanBody typeCoupe
5Seats4
4Doors3
Performance
Nissan CimaSpecificationToyota Supra
—0–100 km/h5,1 s
230 km/hTop speed256 km/h
2988 ccEngine displacement2997 cc
280 HPPower280 HP
387 NmTorque432 Nm
6Cylinders6
Fuel & Consumption
Nissan CimaSpecificationToyota Supra
PetrolFuel typePetrol
80 ltFuel tank70 lt
—Urban consumption13 lt
—Extra-urban consumption9 lt
11 ltAverage consumption11 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Nissan CimaSpecificationToyota Supra
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears6
225/55 R17Tyre size225/50 ZR16; 245/50 ZR16
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Nissan CimaSpecificationToyota Supra
4970 mmLength4520 mm
1820 mmWidth1810 mm
1450 mmHeight1275 mm
1670 KgWeight1510 Kg
2830 mmWheelbase2550 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2001 Nissan Cima and 2000 Toyota Supra approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Toyota Supra leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…