DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1999 Land Rover Range Rover vs 2000 Toyota Sequoia Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Land Rover Range Rover

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

77.75–77.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Land RoverMakeToyota
Range RoverModelSequoia
1999Model year2000
Off-road vehicleBody typeOff-road vehicle
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

9,9 s0–100 km/h—
200 km/hTop speed175 km/h
4552 ccEngine displacement4664 cc
218 HPPower243 HP
400 NmTorque427 Nm
8Cylinders8

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
100 ltFuel tank99 lt
23,9 ltUrban consumption23 lt
12,2 ltExtra-urban consumption13,3 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainRear-wheel drive
4Gears4
255/65R16Tyre size245/70 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4713 mmLength5180 mm
1853 mmWidth1980 mm
1817 mmHeight1860 mm
2120 KgWeight2300 Kg
2745 mmWheelbase3000 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1999 Land Rover Range Rover and 2000 Toyota Sequoia approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Land Rover Range Rover leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…