2000 • Toyota
Regius
Toyota Regius 2.7 i (145 Hp) 2000Overall Score62.5/100
2000 Toyota Regius vs 2000 Land Rover Range Rover Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2000 • Land Rover
Range Rover
Land Rover Range Rover Range 2.5 D (136 Hp) 2000Overall Score62.25/100
WINNER
Toyota Regius
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.
62.5–62.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Toyota RegiusSpecificationLand Rover Range Rover
ToyotaMakeLand Rover
RegiusModelRange Rover
2000Model year2000
MinivanBody typeEstate
8Seats5
4Doors5
Performance
Toyota RegiusSpecificationLand Rover Range Rover
—0–100 km/h14,3 s
0 km/hTop speed185 km/h
2694 ccEngine displacement2497 cc
145 HPPower136 HP
235 NmTorque270 Nm
4Cylinders6
Fuel & Consumption
Toyota RegiusSpecificationLand Rover Range Rover
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
65 ltFuel tank100 lt
—Urban consumption12,8 lt
—Extra-urban consumption8,9 lt
—Average consumption10,6 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Toyota RegiusSpecificationLand Rover Range Rover
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
—Gears5
205/70 R15Tyre size235/70 R16
—ABSYes
Dimensions
Toyota RegiusSpecificationLand Rover Range Rover
4750 mmLength4713 mm
1695 mmWidth1853 mm
1960 mmHeight1817 mm
—Weight2115 Kg
2985 mmWheelbase2745 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2000 Toyota Regius and 2000 Land Rover Range Rover approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Toyota Regius leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…