DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Land Rover Range Rover vs 2000 Toyota Regius Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Toyota Regius

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

62.25–62.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Land RoverMakeToyota
Range RoverModelRegius
2000Model year2000
EstateBody typeMinivan
5Seats8
5Doors4

Performance

14,3 s0–100 km/h—
185 km/hTop speed0 km/h
2497 ccEngine displacement2694 cc
136 HPPower145 HP
270 NmTorque235 Nm
6Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
100 ltFuel tank65 lt
12,8 ltUrban consumption—
8,9 ltExtra-urban consumption—
10,6 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears—
235/70 R16Tyre size205/70 R15
YesABS—

Dimensions

4713 mmLength4750 mm
1853 mmWidth1695 mm
1817 mmHeight1960 mm
2115 KgWeight—
2745 mmWheelbase2985 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Land Rover Range Rover and 2000 Toyota Regius approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Toyota Regius leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…