DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Toyota Regius vs 2000 Rover 25 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Rover 25

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

59.5–60.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

ToyotaMakeRover
RegiusModel25
2000Model year2000
MinivanBody typeHatchback
4Seats5
3Doors3/5

Performance

—0–100 km/h9,9 s
0 km/hTop speed185 km/h
1998 ccEngine displacement1994 cc
110 HPPower101 HP
167 NmTorque240 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
65 ltFuel tank50 lt
—Urban consumption6,9 lt
—Extra-urban consumption4,1 lt
—Average consumption5,1 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
—Gears5
—Tyre size175/65 R14 T
—ABSYes

Dimensions

4430 mmLength3990 mm
1690 mmWidth1688 mm
1980 mmHeight1419 mm
1450 KgWeight1130 Kg
2330 mmWheelbase2500 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Toyota Regius and 2000 Rover 25 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Rover 25 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…