DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Rover 25 vs 2000 Toyota Regius Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Rover 25

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

60.25–59.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

RoverMakeToyota
25ModelRegius
2000Model year2000
HatchbackBody typeMinivan
5Seats4
3/5Doors3

Performance

9,9 s0–100 km/h—
185 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1994 ccEngine displacement1998 cc
101 HPPower110 HP
240 NmTorque167 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
50 ltFuel tank65 lt
6,9 ltUrban consumption—
4,1 ltExtra-urban consumption—
5,1 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears—
175/65 R14 TTyre size—
YesABS—

Dimensions

3990 mmLength4430 mm
1688 mmWidth1690 mm
1419 mmHeight1980 mm
1130 KgWeight1450 Kg
2500 mmWheelbase2330 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Rover 25 and 2000 Toyota Regius approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Rover 25 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…