DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2010 Toyota RAV4 vs 2010 Volvo C30 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Toyota RAV4

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

65.5–64.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

ToyotaMakeVolvo
RAV4ModelC30
2010Model year2010
SUVBody typeCoupe
5Seats5
5Doors3

Performance

10,2 s0–100 km/h9,4 s
190 km/hTop speed0 km/h
2231 ccEngine displacement1984 cc
150 HPPower150 HP
340 NmTorque350 Nm
4Cylinders5

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typeDiesel
60 ltFuel tank60 lt
7,5 ltUrban consumption7,0 lt
5,2 ltExtra-urban consumption4,0 lt
6,0 ltAverage consumption5,1 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
225/65 R17Tyre size—
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4415 mmLength4266 mm
1815 mmWidth1782 mm
1720 mmHeight1447 mm
1670 KgWeight1450 Kg
2560 mmWheelbase2640 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2010 Toyota RAV4 and 2010 Volvo C30 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Toyota RAV4 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…