DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Toyota RAV4 vs 2000 Citroen XM Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Toyota RAV4

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

63.25–62.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

ToyotaMakeCitroen
RAV4ModelXM
2000Model year2000
SUVBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
3Doors5

Performance

—0–100 km/h9,3 s
174 km/hTop speed215 km/h
1998 ccEngine displacement1998 cc
129 HPPower147 HP
175 NmTorque235 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
58 ltFuel tank80 lt
10,4 ltUrban consumption14,5 lt
9,7 ltExtra-urban consumption8,0 lt
7,1 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
215/70 R16Tyre size205/60 R15
—ABSYes

Dimensions

3705 mmLength4708 mm
1695 mmWidth1794 mm
1655 mmHeight1394 mm
1177 KgWeight1401 Kg
2200 mmWheelbase2850 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Toyota RAV4 and 2000 Citroen XM approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Toyota RAV4 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…