DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Citroen XM vs 2000 Toyota RAV4 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Toyota RAV4

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

62.5–63.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

CitroenMakeToyota
XMModelRAV4
2000Model year2000
HatchbackBody typeSUV
5Seats5
5Doors3

Performance

9,3 s0–100 km/h—
215 km/hTop speed174 km/h
1998 ccEngine displacement1998 cc
147 HPPower129 HP
235 NmTorque175 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
80 ltFuel tank58 lt
14,5 ltUrban consumption10,4 lt
8,0 ltExtra-urban consumption9,7 lt
—Average consumption7,1 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
5Gears5
205/60 R15Tyre size215/70 R16
YesABS—

Dimensions

4708 mmLength3705 mm
1794 mmWidth1695 mm
1394 mmHeight1655 mm
1401 KgWeight1177 Kg
2850 mmWheelbase2200 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Citroen XM and 2000 Toyota RAV4 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Toyota RAV4 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…