2000 • AC
Cobra
AC Cobra 5.0 V8 (225 Hp) 2000Overall Score77.5/100
2000 AC Cobra vs 1998 Land Rover Range Rover Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
1998 • Land Rover
Range Rover
Land Rover Range Rover Range 4.6 (218 Hp) 1998Overall Score77.75/100
WINNER
Land Rover Range Rover
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.
77.5–77.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
AC CobraSpecificationLand Rover Range Rover
ACMakeLand Rover
CobraModelRange Rover
2000Model year1998
CabrioletBody typeOff-road vehicle
2Seats5
2Doors5
Performance
AC CobraSpecificationLand Rover Range Rover
5,3 s0–100 km/h9,9 s
250 km/hTop speed200 km/h
4942 ccEngine displacement4552 cc
225 HPPower218 HP
579 NmTorque400 Nm
8Cylinders8
Fuel & Consumption
AC CobraSpecificationLand Rover Range Rover
PetrolFuel typePetrol
75 ltFuel tank100 lt
12,8 ltUrban consumption23,9 lt
—Extra-urban consumption12,2 lt
Transmission & Chassis
AC CobraSpecificationLand Rover Range Rover
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
5Gears4
225/65 VR15Tyre size255/65R16
—ABSYes
Dimensions
AC CobraSpecificationLand Rover Range Rover
4200 mmLength4713 mm
1746 mmWidth1853 mm
1200 mmHeight1817 mm
980 KgWeight2120 Kg
2285 mmWheelbase2745 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2000 AC Cobra and 1998 Land Rover Range Rover approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Land Rover Range Rover leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…