DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 AC Cobra vs 2000 Ford Crown Victoria Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

AC Cobra

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

77.5–76.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

ACMakeFord
CobraModelCrown Victoria
2000Model year2000
CabrioletBody typeSedan
2Seats6
2Doors4

Performance

5,3 s0–100 km/h—
250 km/hTop speed200 km/h
4942 ccEngine displacement4601 cc
225 HPPower238 HP
579 NmTorque373 Nm
8Cylinders8

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
75 ltFuel tank72 lt
12,8 ltUrban consumption15,7 lt
—Extra-urban consumption10,7 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears4
225/65 VR15Tyre size225/60 R16
—ABSYes

Dimensions

4200 mmLength5385 mm
1746 mmWidth1986 mm
1200 mmHeight1443 mm
980 KgWeight1855 Kg
2285 mmWheelbase2913 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 AC Cobra and 2000 Ford Crown Victoria approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, AC Cobra leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…