DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 Toyota Probox vs 2003 Toyota Raum Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Toyota Probox

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

56.5–56.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

ToyotaMakeToyota
ProboxModelRaum
2003Model year2003
EstateBody typeMinivan
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

0 km/hTop speed170 km/h
1497 ccEngine displacement1496 cc
105 HPPower94 HP
127 NmTorque132 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
50 ltFuel tank45 lt
—Urban consumption11 lt
—Extra-urban consumption7 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
—Gears4
175/65 R14Tyre size175/65 R14 S
—ABSYes

Dimensions

4195 mmLength4045 mm
1695 mmWidth1685 mm
1525 mmHeight1535 mm
1030 KgWeight1090 Kg
2550 mmWheelbase2520 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 Toyota Probox and 2003 Toyota Raum approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Toyota Probox leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…