DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2006 BMW X5 vs 2004 Cadillac STS Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Cadillac STS

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

86.75–87.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

BMW X5SpecificationCadillac STS
BMWMakeCadillac
X5ModelSTS
2006Model year2004
SUVBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

BMW X5SpecificationCadillac STS
6,1 s0–100 km/h6,2 s
246 km/hTop speed250 km/h
4799 ccEngine displacement4565 cc
360 HPPower325 HP
490 NmTorque420 Nm
8Cylinders8

Fuel & Consumption

BMW X5SpecificationCadillac STS
PetrolFuel typePetrol
93 ltFuel tank66 lt
18,7 ltUrban consumption13,9 lt
10,5 ltExtra-urban consumption9,1 lt
13,5 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

BMW X5SpecificationCadillac STS
4x4DrivetrainRear-wheel drive
6Gears5
275/40 R20Tyre size255/45 R18
YesABSYes

Dimensions

BMW X5SpecificationCadillac STS
4667 mmLength4985 mm
1872 mmWidth1843 mm
1707 mmHeight1464 mm
2200 KgWeight1780 Kg
2820 mmWheelbase2957 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2006 BMW X5 and 2004 Cadillac STS approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Cadillac STS leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…