DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2004 Cadillac STS vs 2006 BMW X5 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Cadillac STS

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

87.5–86.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Cadillac STSSpecificationBMW X5
CadillacMakeBMW
STSModelX5
2004Model year2006
SedanBody typeSUV
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

Cadillac STSSpecificationBMW X5
6,2 s0–100 km/h6,1 s
250 km/hTop speed246 km/h
4565 ccEngine displacement4799 cc
325 HPPower360 HP
420 NmTorque490 Nm
8Cylinders8

Fuel & Consumption

Cadillac STSSpecificationBMW X5
PetrolFuel typePetrol
66 ltFuel tank93 lt
13,9 ltUrban consumption18,7 lt
9,1 ltExtra-urban consumption10,5 lt
—Average consumption13,5 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Cadillac STSSpecificationBMW X5
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
5Gears6
255/45 R18Tyre size275/40 R20
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Cadillac STSSpecificationBMW X5
4985 mmLength4667 mm
1843 mmWidth1872 mm
1464 mmHeight1707 mm
1780 KgWeight2200 Kg
2957 mmWheelbase2820 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2004 Cadillac STS and 2006 BMW X5 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Cadillac STS leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…