1998 • Toyota
Progres
Toyota Progres 3.0 i 24V (215 Hp) 1998Overall Score71.25/100
1998 Toyota Progres vs 1998 Mazda Sentia Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
1998 • Mazda
Sentia
Mazda Sentia 3.0 i V6 18V (160 Hp) 1998Overall Score70.5/100
WINNER
Toyota Progres
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
71.25–70.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Toyota ProgresSpecificationMazda Sentia
ToyotaMakeMazda
ProgresModelSentia
1998Model year1998
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4
Performance
Toyota ProgresSpecificationMazda Sentia
180 km/hTop speed200 km/h
2997 ccEngine displacement2954 cc
215 HPPower160 HP
294 NmTorque250 Nm
6Cylinders6
Fuel & Consumption
Toyota ProgresSpecificationMazda Sentia
PetrolFuel typePetrol
70 ltFuel tank70 lt
14 ltUrban consumption16 lt
9 ltExtra-urban consumption9 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Toyota ProgresSpecificationMazda Sentia
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
4Gears4
195/65 R15Tyre size205/65 R15 93 H
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Toyota ProgresSpecificationMazda Sentia
4510 mmLength4895 mm
1700 mmWidth1795 mm
1435 mmHeight1420 mm
1520 KgWeight1530 Kg
2780 mmWheelbase2850 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
1998 Toyota Progres and 1998 Mazda Sentia approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Toyota Progres leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…