1998 • Mazda
Sentia
Mazda Sentia 3.0 i V6 18V (160 Hp) 1998Overall Score70.5/100
1998 Mazda Sentia vs 1998 Toyota Progres Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
1998 • Toyota
Progres
Toyota Progres 3.0 i 24V (215 Hp) 1998Overall Score71.25/100
WINNER
Toyota Progres
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
70.5–71.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Mazda SentiaSpecificationToyota Progres
MazdaMakeToyota
SentiaModelProgres
1998Model year1998
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4
Performance
Mazda SentiaSpecificationToyota Progres
200 km/hTop speed180 km/h
2954 ccEngine displacement2997 cc
160 HPPower215 HP
250 NmTorque294 Nm
6Cylinders6
Fuel & Consumption
Mazda SentiaSpecificationToyota Progres
PetrolFuel typePetrol
70 ltFuel tank70 lt
16 ltUrban consumption14 lt
9 ltExtra-urban consumption9 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Mazda SentiaSpecificationToyota Progres
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
4Gears4
205/65 R15 93 HTyre size195/65 R15
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Mazda SentiaSpecificationToyota Progres
4895 mmLength4510 mm
1795 mmWidth1700 mm
1420 mmHeight1435 mm
1530 KgWeight1520 Kg
2850 mmWheelbase2780 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
1998 Mazda Sentia and 1998 Toyota Progres approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Toyota Progres leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…