DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2013 Toyota Proace vs 2013 Kia Optima Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Kia Optima

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

62.5–63.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

ToyotaMakeKia
ProaceModelOptima
2013Model year2013
MinivanBody typeSedan
3Seats5
5/6Doors4

Performance

12,2 s0–100 km/h9,4 s
170 km/hTop speed190 km/h
1997 ccEngine displacement1999 cc
128 HPPower150 HP
320 NmTorque180 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typeHybrid – Petrol / Electric
80 ltFuel tank65 lt
7,6 ltUrban consumption5,9 lt
5,8 ltExtra-urban consumption5,0 lt
6,4 ltAverage consumption5,1 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrain—
6Gears—
215/60 R16Tyre size—
YesABS—

Dimensions

4813 mmLength4845 mm
1895 mmWidth1830 mm
1980 mmHeight1455 mm
1761-1873 KgWeight1587-1648 Kg
3000 mmWheelbase2795 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2013 Toyota Proace and 2013 Kia Optima approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Kia Optima leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…