2013 • Kia
Optima
Kia Optima 2.0i 16V Hybrid (177 Hp) 2013Overall Score63.25/100
2013 Kia Optima vs 2013 Toyota Proace Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2013 • Toyota
Proace
Toyota Proace 2.0 D4-D (128 Hp) 2013Overall Score62.5/100
WINNER
Kia Optima
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
63.25–62.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Kia OptimaSpecificationToyota Proace
KiaMakeToyota
OptimaModelProace
2013Model year2013
SedanBody typeMinivan
5Seats3
4Doors5/6
Performance
Kia OptimaSpecificationToyota Proace
9,4 s0–100 km/h12,2 s
190 km/hTop speed170 km/h
1999 ccEngine displacement1997 cc
150 HPPower128 HP
180 NmTorque320 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Kia OptimaSpecificationToyota Proace
Hybrid – Petrol / ElectricFuel typeDiesel
65 ltFuel tank80 lt
5,9 ltUrban consumption7,6 lt
5,0 ltExtra-urban consumption5,8 lt
5,1 ltAverage consumption6,4 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Dimensions
Kia OptimaSpecificationToyota Proace
4845 mmLength4813 mm
1830 mmWidth1895 mm
1455 mmHeight1980 mm
1587-1648 KgWeight1761-1873 Kg
2795 mmWheelbase3000 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2013 Kia Optima and 2013 Toyota Proace approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Kia Optima leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…